Files
dify/api/services/dify_builder/graph_ops.py
Charles YaoandClaude Opus 5 10a6e0b9ef fix(dify-builder): a re-route is a change, and a comment is not a claim
Four small things the whole-branch review found, none of which changes what a
guard decides.

`_change_not_applied`'s docstring said the gate's other two exits "both clear
this store". Task 7's fix round moved the clear to `handle_impact_analysis` and
made it conditional on the rules actually changing, so neither
continue_adjusting nor revert clears it -- and two tests assert exactly that. A
maintainer trusting the comment would re-add the clear to the revert path,
which is the bug Task 7 removed. Reworded to name the sole, conditional clear
and the two tests that pin it.

`already_present_predicate` keyed a connect on `(from, to)` alone, so a repair
that re-routes an arm of a branch between the same pair of nodes matched the
edge already there and was dropped as a no-op -- in the dry run and at
`apply_repair`, which runs the same predicate. The handle is now part of the
key on both sides, defaulting to "source" the way graphon reads a missing one.

`_build_node`'s defaults merge was shallow, so `model: {provider, name}`
replaced the whole default block and the node was refused for `model.mode` --
spending the one corrective re-prompt on a field the default was carrying. It
now merges one level into a dict-valued default, with one exclusion that the
suite caught immediately: a block whose `type` the caller did not write is left
alone, because `type` reinterprets its siblings and completing a partial
`authorization` from the default produces a node that looks authorized, sends
no credential, and is written in silence.

`_withheld_args` redacted a `value` shaped like a whole node `data`, which is
not what `set_node_config` sends: `path="headers"` with a header line reached
the retry prompt unredacted. The value is now also redacted as what it is --
the value at that path -- by wrapping it back into its own nesting and running
the one redaction profile over it, so `credentials` stays the single definition
of what a credential is. Unreachable with a stored secret today.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-22 23:11:17 -07:00

704 lines
33 KiB
Python

"""Pure, client-side graph mutation helpers.
Dify's ``sync_draft_workflow`` has no server-side patch primitive: it always
replaces the whole draft graph. The adapter (``dify_port.py``) therefore
reads the current graph, applies mutations like ``apply_set_node_config``
locally, and writes the whole mutated graph back. These helpers do the local
mutation only — no DB, no services, no I/O.
"""
import copy
import hashlib
import json
from collections.abc import Callable
from typing import Any, NamedTuple
from core.dify_builder.models import Graph, MutationIntent
from core.dify_builder.node_defaults import default_config_or_empty
from core.workflow.graph_normalizers import declared_branch_handles, heal_nodes_for_preflight
from services.dify_builder import credentials
MUTATION_ARG_KEYS: dict[str, tuple[str, ...]] = {
"set_node_config": ("node_id", "path", "value"),
"create_node": ("node_type", "config"),
"delete_node": ("node_id",),
"connect": ("from_node", "to_node"),
"insert_between": ("edge", "node_type", "config"),
}
# ReactFlow containment, matching what the generator computes for a child of
# an iteration/loop container (core/workflow/generator/runner.py:1441-1442).
_CHILD_EXTENT = "parent"
_CHILD_Z_INDEX = 1002
# Args that name a node. An LLM occasionally emits these as ints or empty
# strings; unchecked they reach diff_graphs, which drops falsy/non-str ids
# from its node maps, and then crash build_change_set's join (ESQ1-271).
_NODE_ID_ARGS = ("node_id", "from_node", "to_node")
# `path` reaches _resolve_path's str.split; a non-string raises AttributeError
# there, so the rejection reason the repair agent reads is a Python internals
# message instead of an actionable one.
_STRING_ARGS = ("path",)
# The args that carry a node's data into the draft, and so the args through
# which a redaction placeholder could overwrite a real credential:
# set_node_config's `value`, create_node's and insert_between's `config`.
_REDACTABLE_ARGS = ("value", "config")
# Inside a node's config, the one key that REINTERPRETS its siblings rather
# than sitting beside them: an http-request `authorization` is `{type, config}`
# and a `body` is `{type, data}`, and `type` decides whether the sibling is read
# at all. `_build_node`'s deeper defaults merge never fills it in behind a
# caller who wrote the siblings without it -- `{"config": {"type": "bearer",
# "api_key": ...}}` merged under `{"type": "no-auth", ...}` is a node that
# LOOKS authorized, sends no credential, and was written in silence. This is
# `node_defaults`' "a default may fill a blank, never invent a purpose" rule,
# one level down.
_MODE_KEY = "type"
def validate_intent_args(intent: MutationIntent) -> None:
"""Raise ``ValueError`` if ``intent.args`` is missing a required key for
``intent.op``, or if ``intent.op`` isn't one of ``MUTATION_ARG_KEYS``'s
five recognized verbs. Optional keys (marked ``?`` on ``MutationIntent``)
are not checked here -- each ``apply_*`` function defaults them itself.
Also refuses any ``value`` / ``config`` carrying ``credentials.REDACTED``.
The agents show a node's config with its secrets replaced by that sentinel;
a model that then rewrites the surrounding field hands the placeholder
straight back, and writing it would destroy a live credential. Raising
here is the whole guard: this function is the one chokepoint both the
``filter_applicable`` dry run and ``dify_port.apply_repair``'s write loop
pass every intent through, so a refused value is rejected with a reason
the corrective re-prompt can read and the stored credential stands
untouched. Keyed on the exact generated string, never on model prose.
"""
required = MUTATION_ARG_KEYS.get(intent.op)
if required is None:
raise ValueError(f"unknown mutation op: {intent.op!r}")
missing = [key for key in required if key not in intent.args]
if missing:
raise ValueError(f"missing required arg(s) {missing} for op {intent.op!r}")
for key in _NODE_ID_ARGS:
if key not in intent.args:
continue
value = intent.args[key]
if not isinstance(value, str) or not value:
raise ValueError(f"{key} must be a non-empty string for op {intent.op!r}, got {value!r}")
for key in _STRING_ARGS:
if key not in intent.args:
continue
value = intent.args[key]
if not isinstance(value, str) or not value:
raise ValueError(f"{key} must be a non-empty string for op {intent.op!r}, got {value!r}")
# KNOWN AND ACCEPTED, deliberately not closed here: this stops the model
# handing the PLACEHOLDER back, not a rewrite that simply OMITS the
# Authorization line. That write carries no sentinel, passes, and clobbers
# the credential. The difference is that its failure is LOUD -- the next
# verify run fails authentication and lands in the repair loop with a real
# error -- where the leak this guard closes was silent and unrecoverable.
# Closing it would need merge semantics for a free-text `headers` blob,
# which is a larger design change and would break legitimate deletion.
for key in _REDACTABLE_ARGS:
if key in intent.args and credentials.carries_redaction(intent.args[key]):
raise ValueError(
f"{key} for op {intent.op!r} contains the redaction placeholder "
f"{credentials.REDACTED!r}: that is not the real secret. Leave the field "
"unchanged, or set it to a real value."
)
def _resolve_path(container: dict[str, Any], path: str) -> tuple[Any, str | int]:
"""Walk ``path``'s parent segments and return ``(parent, last_key)``.
Segments are dot-separated; an all-digit segment indexes a list, any
other segment is a mapping key. Only the FINAL segment may be absent --
that is the key being written. Every intermediate segment must already
resolve, and a segment that cannot be walked raises ``ValueError``.
Raising is the point. ``filter_applicable`` dry-runs each intent through
this function and turns the exception into a rejection reason the repair
agent sees on its next attempt. Before this existed, a dotted path wrote
one flat junk key that the workflow engine ignored, so every nested
repair silently did nothing (ESQ1-285, ESQ1-290).
"""
segments = path.split(".")
if not path or any(segment == "" for segment in segments):
raise ValueError(f"empty segment in path: {path!r}")
cursor: Any = container
for depth, segment in enumerate(segments[:-1]):
walked = ".".join(segments[: depth + 1])
if segment.isdigit():
if not isinstance(cursor, list):
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: {walked} indexes a {type(cursor).__name__}, not a list")
index = int(segment)
if index >= len(cursor):
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: index {index} out of range at {walked} (len {len(cursor)})")
cursor = cursor[index]
continue
if not isinstance(cursor, dict):
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: {walked} is not a mapping")
if segment not in cursor:
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: no key {segment!r} at {walked}")
cursor = cursor[segment]
last = segments[-1]
if last.isdigit():
if not isinstance(cursor, list):
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: final segment indexes a {type(cursor).__name__}, not a list")
index = int(last)
if index >= len(cursor):
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: index {index} out of range (len {len(cursor)})")
return cursor, index
if not isinstance(cursor, dict):
raise ValueError(f"path {path!r}: final container is a {type(cursor).__name__}, not a mapping")
return cursor, last
def value_at_path(data: dict[str, Any], path: str) -> tuple[bool, Any]:
"""``(True, value)`` for the value ``path`` addresses inside a node's
``data``, or ``(False, None)`` when nothing is there.
The read half of ``apply_set_node_config``, through the same
``_resolve_path`` walk, so a caller comparing what a path held BEFORE a
write against what it holds after cannot disagree with the write about
which slot the path names. ``_resolve_path`` returns the parent for a final
segment that does not exist yet -- that is the key being created -- so the
read is attempted and its absence reported rather than raised.
"""
try:
parent, key = _resolve_path(data, path)
return True, parent[key]
except (ValueError, KeyError, IndexError, TypeError):
return False, None
def apply_set_node_config(graph: Graph, node_id: str, path: str, value: Any) -> tuple[Graph, list[str]]:
"""Set the value at ``path`` inside ``node["data"]`` for the node whose
``id == node_id``. ``path`` is dot-separated (``"code"``,
``"cases.0.conditions.1.value"``); see ``_resolve_path``.
The placeholder agent emits intents shaped ``{node_id, path, value}``
(e.g. ``path="code"`` to rewrite a Code node's ``data["code"]``); this is
the mutation that consumes them.
Returns a ``(new_graph, changed_node_ids)`` tuple. ``graph`` is
deep-copied first and never mutated. Raises ``ValueError`` if no node in
``graph["nodes"]`` has a matching ``id``.
``value`` is deep-copied too, so the new graph shares no structure with the
caller's argument. It is normally ``intent.args["value"]``, and the graph it
lands in is then healed in place (``heal_nodes_for_preflight`` rewrites
``">="`` to ``"≥"`` and ``60`` to ``"60"``): without the copy the caller's
own intent would change under it, so a dry run would silently rewrite the
very intents it was asked to judge.
"""
new_graph = copy.deepcopy(graph)
for node in new_graph.get("nodes", []):
if node.get("id") == node_id:
parent, key = _resolve_path(node.setdefault("data", {}), path)
parent[key] = copy.deepcopy(value)
return new_graph, [node_id]
raise ValueError(f"node not found: {node_id}")
def _next_unique_id(base: str, existing_ids: set) -> str:
"""Return ``base`` if unused, else ``base_2``, ``base_3``, ... on
collision with ``existing_ids``. Shared bump sequence for node ids
(``_next_node_id``) and edge ids (``_make_edge``)."""
candidate = base
suffix = 1
while candidate in existing_ids:
suffix += 1
candidate = f"{base}_{suffix}"
return candidate
def _next_node_id(prefix: str, existing_ids: set) -> str:
"""Return a short, human-readable node id not present in ``existing_ids``.
Mirrors ``core.workflow.generator.runner._next_generated_node_id``'s
prefix, then prefix_2, prefix_3, ... collision scheme -- reimplemented
locally so this module stays free of any dependency on the generator
subsystem.
"""
return _next_unique_id(prefix, existing_ids)
def _default_position(graph: Graph) -> dict[str, float]:
"""Place a new node to the right of the rightmost existing node.
Slice 1 uses simple deterministic rightward placement, not the
generator's topology-aware layout (``_layout_top_level_nodes``) --
good enough for one node at a time; a smarter layout is Slice 2/3's
concern if the canvas ever needs it.
"""
nodes = graph.get("nodes", [])
if not nodes:
return {"x": 100.0, "y": 100.0}
max_x = max(float(n.get("position", {}).get("x", 0.0)) for n in nodes)
return {"x": max_x + 260.0, "y": 100.0}
def _build_node(
graph: Graph,
node_type: str,
config: dict[str, Any],
position: dict[str, float] | None,
node_id: str | None,
parent_id: str | None = None,
flow_type: str | None = None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Construct one ``GraphNodeDict``-shaped node, generating an id/position
when omitted (mirrors the generator's ``_fill_node_defaults``,
``core/workflow/generator/runner.py:2387-2394``). Raises ``ValueError``
if a caller-supplied ``node_id`` already exists in ``graph["nodes"]``.
``flow_type`` is the node-level ReactFlow type. Almost every node is the
generic ``"custom"`` (the default), but iteration/loop start markers carry
``"custom-iteration-start"`` / ``"custom-loop-start"`` and the canvas has
no component for them under ``"custom"`` (React error #130, ESQ1-288).
``node_type``'s registered defaults (``core.dify_builder.node_defaults``)
are merged UNDER ``config``: a key the caller supplied always wins, and a
key it omitted is filled with the value Dify's own editor would have
created the node with. Several node types have engine-required fields with
no default -- a ``template-transform`` without ``variables`` makes the draft
preflight refuse the whole repair batch -- and an LLM writes only the fields
it was thinking about. This is the one chokepoint every created node passes
through, so it covers Build, Edit and Fix, ``create_node`` and
``insert_between``, and the ``filter_applicable`` dry run alike.
The merge goes ONE level into a default whose value is a dict, for the same
reason: an LLM writing ``model: {provider, name}`` was thinking about the
provider and the model name, not about ``mode`` or ``completion_params``,
and a shallow merge dropped those with the rest of the block -- so the
engine refused the node for ``model.mode`` and the one corrective re-prompt
was spent on a field the default was already carrying. One level, not a
recursive merge: a caller value that is not a dict replaces the default
outright, and a dict nested deeper is still the caller's word entirely.
With one exclusion, and it is the reason this is not a blanket deep merge
(see ``_MODE_KEY``): a default block whose ``type`` the caller did not write
keeps today's shallow behaviour, because ``type`` reinterprets its siblings
instead of sitting beside them. Merging it in turns a partial
``authorization`` -- the caller's ``config`` with a bearer token in it --
into a ``no-auth`` node that sends no credential and is written in silence,
which is exactly the failure a default is forbidden from creating.
"""
existing_ids = {n.get("id") for n in graph.get("nodes", [])}
if node_id is not None:
if node_id in existing_ids:
raise ValueError(f"node id already exists: {node_id}")
new_id = node_id
else:
new_id = _next_node_id(node_type, existing_ids)
defaults = default_config_or_empty(node_type)
data = {**defaults, **copy.deepcopy(config)}
for key, default_value in defaults.items():
supplied = data.get(key)
if not isinstance(default_value, dict) or not isinstance(supplied, dict):
continue
if _MODE_KEY in default_value and _MODE_KEY not in supplied:
continue
data[key] = {**default_value, **supplied}
data["type"] = node_type # data.type is the real node type -- never overridden by config
data.setdefault("title", new_id)
data.setdefault("desc", "")
data.setdefault("selected", False)
node: dict[str, Any] = {
"id": new_id,
"type": flow_type or "custom",
"position": position if position is not None else _default_position(graph),
"data": data,
}
if parent_id:
# Containment lives at node level, NOT inside data. Without these the
# child renders outside its container and the container does not run
# it -- the data-level isInIteration/iteration_id markers are not
# enough on their own.
node["parentId"] = parent_id
node["extent"] = _CHILD_EXTENT
node["zIndex"] = _CHILD_Z_INDEX
return node
def apply_create_node(
graph: Graph,
node_type: str,
config: dict[str, Any],
position: dict[str, float] | None = None,
node_id: str | None = None,
parent_id: str | None = None,
flow_type: str | None = None,
) -> tuple[Graph, list[str]]:
"""Append a new ``GraphNodeDict``-shaped node to the graph.
``node_id`` is optional (not part of spec Sec 9's terse args list) --
when omitted a short id is generated from ``node_type``; when supplied,
a collision with an existing node id raises ``ValueError`` (the Slice 1
duplicate-id validation). ``parent_id``, when truthy, nests the new node
inside an existing iteration/loop container and adds the matching
``extent``/``zIndex`` wrapper keys. ``flow_type``, when truthy, overrides
the node-level ReactFlow type (defaults to ``"custom"``); container start
markers need their own. Returns ``(new_graph, [new_node_id])``.
"""
new_graph = copy.deepcopy(graph)
node = _build_node(new_graph, node_type, config, position, node_id, parent_id, flow_type)
new_graph.setdefault("nodes", []).append(node)
return new_graph, [node["id"]]
def apply_delete_node(graph: Graph, node_id: str) -> tuple[Graph, list[str]]:
"""Remove the node with ``id == node_id`` and every edge touching it.
Raises ``ValueError`` if no node in ``graph["nodes"]`` has a matching
``id`` (mirrors ``apply_set_node_config``'s not-found behavior).
Returns ``(new_graph, [node_id])``.
"""
new_graph = copy.deepcopy(graph)
nodes = new_graph.get("nodes", [])
if not any(n.get("id") == node_id for n in nodes):
raise ValueError(f"node not found: {node_id}")
new_graph["nodes"] = [n for n in nodes if n.get("id") != node_id]
new_graph["edges"] = [
e for e in new_graph.get("edges", []) if e.get("source") != node_id and e.get("target") != node_id
]
return new_graph, [node_id]
def _make_edge(
source: str, target: str, source_handle: str | None, target_handle: str | None, existing_edge_ids: set
) -> dict:
"""Build one ``GraphEdgeDict``-shaped edge dict with a fresh
collision-free id (``source-target``, then ``source-target_2``, ... on
collision with ``existing_edge_ids``). Handles default to
"source"/"target" (mirrors the generator's ``_fill_edge_defaults``)."""
return {
"id": _next_unique_id(f"{source}-{target}", existing_edge_ids),
"source": source,
"target": target,
"type": "custom",
"sourceHandle": source_handle or "source",
"targetHandle": target_handle or "target",
}
def apply_connect(
graph: Graph,
from_node: str,
to_node: str,
source_handle: str | None = None,
target_handle: str | None = None,
) -> tuple[Graph, list[str]]:
"""Add a ``GraphEdgeDict``-shaped edge between two existing nodes.
Raises ``ValueError`` if either ``from_node`` or ``to_node`` is not a
node id present in ``graph["nodes"]`` (the Slice 1 dangling-ref
validation), or if ``from_node`` is a branch node (if-else /
question-classifier / human-input / fail-branch) and ``source_handle``
(or the default "source") is not one of its declared handles. Handles
default to "source"/"target" (mirrors the generator's
``_fill_edge_defaults``). Returns ``(new_graph, [from_node, to_node])``.
"""
new_graph = copy.deepcopy(graph)
nodes_by_id = {n.get("id"): n for n in new_graph.get("nodes", [])}
if from_node not in nodes_by_id:
raise ValueError(f"node not found: {from_node}")
if to_node not in nodes_by_id:
raise ValueError(f"node not found: {to_node}")
# A branch node (if-else / question-classifier / human-input / fail-branch)
# only routes along the handles it declares. An edge on any other handle
# -- including the default "source" -- hangs off nothing: its arm never
# runs and the run still reports "succeeded" (ESQ1-303). Reject it here
# like a dangling node ref; the caller's ``except ValueError`` shows it.
declared = declared_branch_handles(nodes_by_id[from_node])
handle = source_handle or "source"
if declared and handle not in declared:
raise ValueError(f"branch node {from_node!r} has no handle {handle!r}; it declares {declared}")
existing_edge_ids = {e.get("id") for e in new_graph.get("edges", [])}
edge = _make_edge(from_node, to_node, source_handle, target_handle, existing_edge_ids)
new_graph.setdefault("edges", []).append(edge)
return new_graph, [from_node, to_node]
def apply_insert_between(
graph: Graph,
edge: dict[str, str],
node_type: str,
config: dict[str, Any],
position: dict[str, float] | None = None,
node_id: str | None = None,
) -> tuple[Graph, list[str]]:
"""Split an existing edge with a new node: remove the old edge, add
``old_source -> new_node`` and ``new_node -> old_target``.
``edge`` identifies the edge to split by ``{"source": ..., "target": ...}``
(matching Dify's own edge fields, not a caller-known internal edge id).
Raises ``ValueError`` if no edge in ``graph["edges"]`` matches (the
Slice 1 dangling-ref validation). Returns ``(new_graph, [new_node_id])``.
"""
old_source = edge.get("source")
old_target = edge.get("target")
new_graph = copy.deepcopy(graph)
edges = new_graph.get("edges", [])
matched = next((e for e in edges if e.get("source") == old_source and e.get("target") == old_target), None)
if matched is None:
raise ValueError(f"edge not found: {old_source} -> {old_target}")
node = _build_node(new_graph, node_type, config, position, node_id)
new_id = node["id"]
new_graph.setdefault("nodes", []).append(node)
remaining_edges = [e for e in edges if e is not matched]
existing_edge_ids = {e.get("id") for e in remaining_edges}
incoming = _make_edge(old_source, new_id, matched.get("sourceHandle"), "target", existing_edge_ids)
existing_edge_ids.add(incoming["id"])
outgoing = _make_edge(new_id, old_target, "source", matched.get("targetHandle"), existing_edge_ids)
new_graph["edges"] = [*remaining_edges, incoming, outgoing]
return new_graph, [new_id]
def diff_graphs(before: Graph, after: Graph) -> tuple[list[str], str]:
"""Compare two graphs and return ``(changes, scope)``.
``scope`` is ``"structure"`` if any node or edge was added or removed,
else ``"configuration"`` if any surviving node's ``data`` changed, else
``"configuration"`` with an empty ``changes`` list if nothing differs.
``changes`` is human-readable lines (e.g. ``"added node knowledge-1"``,
``"added knowledge-1 → llm-1"``, ``"llm-1: prompt_template updated"``)
-- not bare ids.
"""
before_nodes = {n.get("id"): n for n in before.get("nodes", []) if n.get("id")}
after_nodes = {n.get("id"): n for n in after.get("nodes", []) if n.get("id")}
def _edge_key(e: dict[str, Any]) -> tuple[str, str, str, str]:
return (
str(e.get("source")),
str(e.get("target")),
str(e.get("sourceHandle") or "source"),
str(e.get("targetHandle") or "target"),
)
before_edges = {_edge_key(e) for e in before.get("edges", [])}
after_edges = {_edge_key(e) for e in after.get("edges", [])}
added_nodes = sorted(after_nodes.keys() - before_nodes.keys())
removed_nodes = sorted(before_nodes.keys() - after_nodes.keys())
added_edges = sorted(after_edges - before_edges)
removed_edges = sorted(before_edges - after_edges)
changes: list[str] = []
changes.extend(f"added node {node_id}" for node_id in added_nodes)
changes.extend(f"removed node {node_id}" for node_id in removed_nodes)
changes.extend(f"added {source} → {target}" for source, target, _sh, _th in added_edges)
changes.extend(f"removed {source} → {target}" for source, target, _sh, _th in removed_edges)
for node_id in sorted(before_nodes.keys() & after_nodes.keys()):
before_data = before_nodes[node_id].get("data", {})
after_data = after_nodes[node_id].get("data", {})
changed_keys = sorted(
key for key in set(before_data) | set(after_data) if before_data.get(key) != after_data.get(key)
)
changes.extend(f"{node_id}: {key} updated" for key in changed_keys)
structural = bool(added_nodes or removed_nodes or added_edges or removed_edges)
return changes, "structure" if structural else "configuration"
def structural_fingerprint(graph: Graph) -> str:
"""Stable hash of a graph's STRUCTURE only -- node identity+type and edge
topology -- EXCLUDING node ``data`` config. Two graphs with the same
nodes/edges but different node configs share a fingerprint; adding,
removing, or reconnecting a node changes it. Used by recovery (C-1) to
tell a config-only hand-edit from a structural one. Order-independent
(nodes and edges are sorted before hashing)."""
nodes = sorted((str(n.get("id", "")), str((n.get("data") or {}).get("type", ""))) for n in graph.get("nodes", []))
edges = sorted(
(
str(e.get("source", "")),
str(e.get("target", "")),
str(e.get("sourceHandle", "")),
str(e.get("targetHandle", "")),
)
for e in graph.get("edges", [])
)
canonical = json.dumps({"nodes": nodes, "edges": edges}, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":"))
return hashlib.sha256(canonical.encode("utf-8")).hexdigest()
def node_ids(graph: Graph) -> list[str]:
"""The ids of every node in ``graph``, in document order (missing-id
nodes skipped). Used by recovery's target-presence check."""
return [str(n["id"]) for n in graph.get("nodes", []) if n.get("id") is not None]
STRUCTURAL_OPS: frozenset[str] = frozenset({"create_node", "delete_node", "connect", "insert_between"})
APPLY_FNS: dict[str, Any] = {
"set_node_config": apply_set_node_config,
"create_node": apply_create_node,
"delete_node": apply_delete_node,
"connect": apply_connect,
"insert_between": apply_insert_between,
}
def already_present_predicate(graph: Graph, intents: list[MutationIntent]) -> Callable[[MutationIntent], bool]:
"""The idempotent-re-entry rule: ``True`` for an intent ``graph`` already
satisfies.
An interrupted step's Retry re-sends the same batch against an
already-mutated draft, so a ``create_node`` for an id that is now present and
a ``connect`` for an edge that is now present are clean no-ops rather than
errors. ``dify_port.apply_repair`` drops them before its apply loop, and
``filter_applicable`` skips them in its dry run for the same reason: without
this the dry run rejects a duplicate ``create_node`` ("node id already
exists") that the port would have quietly dropped, and burns the one
corrective re-prompt on a batch that was going to apply cleanly.
Ids targeted by a ``delete_node`` in THIS SAME batch do not count as present:
a from-scratch build sends ``delete_node(placeholder_start)`` +
``create_node(same id)`` in one batch, and without the exclusion the create
would be dropped as already-present while the delete still ran.
An edge is keyed on ``(source, target, sourceHandle)``, not on the pair
alone. Two edges between the same nodes on DIFFERENT handles are different
edges -- they leave different arms of a branch -- so a repair that re-routes
an arm is not something the draft already satisfies. Keyed on the pair, it
matched the edge already there and was dropped as a no-op here AND at
``dify_port.apply_repair``, which runs this same predicate: a legitimate
repair silently discarded. Both sides default a missing handle to
``"source"``, which is how graphon reads one (``edge_config.get
("sourceHandle", "source")``), so an intent that omits it still matches an
edge persisted with it.
"""
deleted_ids = {i.args.get("node_id") for i in intents if i.op == "delete_node"}
present_node_ids = {n.get("id") for n in graph.get("nodes") or []} - deleted_ids
present_edges = {
(e.get("source"), e.get("target"), e.get("sourceHandle") or "source")
for e in graph.get("edges") or []
if e.get("source") not in deleted_ids and e.get("target") not in deleted_ids
}
def already_present(intent: MutationIntent) -> bool:
if intent.op == "create_node":
return intent.args.get("node_id") in present_node_ids
if intent.op == "connect":
return (
intent.args.get("from_node"),
intent.args.get("to_node"),
intent.args.get("source_handle") or "source",
) in present_edges
return False
return already_present
class DryRun(NamedTuple):
"""What ``filter_applicable`` learned from dry-running a batch of intents.
``applicable`` and ``rejected`` are the pair this function has always
returned. ``graph`` is the working copy those applicable intents produced --
the graph ``dify_port.apply_repair`` would be about to write, healed the same
way. It is returned rather than discarded so ``preflight.vet_intents`` can
put it through the node-data validation the port's own preflight performs,
while there is still a corrective re-prompt left to spend on the answer.
``changed_nodes`` is the ids those applicable intents wrote NODE DATA to, in
order, which is what ``preflight.new_preflight_problems`` needs to tell a
node this batch is answerable for from one it merely left alone. It is
narrower than a change set in two deliberate ways, and both matter because
a node in it loses its pre-existing-defect exemption entirely:
* ``connect`` is EXCLUDED. ``apply_connect`` reports both endpoints as
changed -- correct for a diff, wrong here: adding an edge cannot change
either endpoint's ``validate_node_config`` verdict, so counting them would
let merely WIRING an already-broken node make that node's pre-existing
defect veto the whole batch. Nothing is given up by leaving it out.
* the heal is not folded in. ``heal_nodes_for_preflight`` scans EVERY node,
not only the ones the intents named, so its ids would make an unrelated
node the healer normalized count as written by this batch. Same pre-heal
point in the sequence as ``dify_port.apply_repair``'s own copy.
"""
applicable: list[MutationIntent]
rejected: list[tuple[MutationIntent, str]]
graph: Graph
changed_nodes: list[str]
def filter_applicable(
graph: Graph,
intents: list[MutationIntent],
allowed_node_types: set[str] | None = None,
) -> DryRun:
"""Dry-run each intent through the real validate_intent_args + apply_* on a
working deep copy, in order (so a connect sees a node an earlier create_node
added). Returns a ``DryRun``: ``(applicable, rejected, graph, changed_nodes)``,
where each rejected entry is ``(intent, reason)``, ``graph`` is the mutated
working copy and ``changed_nodes`` is the ids whose node DATA those intents
wrote (see ``DryRun``).
Catches every failure the live apply_repair would hit -- unknown op, missing
required arg / extra arg key, dangling node/edge ref, duplicate id -- and
additionally rejects a create_node / insert_between whose node_type is not in
allowed_node_types (a check apply_* does not do). Applicable intents advance
the working copy; a rejected intent does not.
An intent the graph already satisfies is neither applied nor rejected, and
stays in ``applicable`` for the port to drop the same way
(``already_present_predicate``, which the port runs before its own apply
loop). The working copy already reflects it -- that is what "already
present" means -- so the graph returned here is still what the port would
write.
The working copy then goes through the shared deterministic heal set
(``core.workflow.graph_normalizers.heal_nodes_for_preflight``), exactly as
``dify_port.apply_repair`` runs it over the real draft after its own apply
loop. Same normalizers, same place in the sequence, one definition: a dry run
that healed less than the write chokepoint would report a defect the write
was going to fix, and one that healed more would pass a batch the write would
refuse. Both make the answer this function gives about the port a guess.
"""
working = copy.deepcopy(graph)
is_already_present = already_present_predicate(graph, intents)
applicable: list[MutationIntent] = []
rejected: list[tuple[MutationIntent, str]] = []
changed_nodes: list[str] = []
for intent in intents:
# Before validate_intent_args, exactly where the port drops it.
if is_already_present(intent):
applicable.append(intent)
continue
try:
validate_intent_args(intent)
if allowed_node_types is not None and intent.op in ("create_node", "insert_between"):
node_type = intent.args.get("node_type")
if node_type not in allowed_node_types:
rejected.append((intent, f"node_type not allowed: {node_type!r}"))
continue
working, changed = APPLY_FNS[intent.op](working, **intent.args)
except Exception as exc:
rejected.append((intent, str(exc)))
continue
# A connect writes an EDGE; its endpoints' node data is untouched (see
# ``DryRun.changed_nodes``). Mirrored in ``dify_port.apply_repair``.
if intent.op != "connect":
changed_nodes.extend(changed)
applicable.append(intent)
heal_nodes_for_preflight(working.get("nodes") or [])
return DryRun(applicable, rejected, working, changed_nodes)